HOME PAGE
     UTILITY DIRECTOR
     HUMAN RESOURCES
     ABOUT US
     CONTACT US
     CALENDAR
     2008 HOLIDAY CALENDAR
   
CUSTOMER SERVICE
     BILLING DEPARTMENT
     FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
ENGINEERING
     NEW SEWERS
     DISTRICT PROJECTS
     LATERAL CONNECTIONS
     GIS MAPPING
     SPECIFICATIONS & DOWNLOADS
     SEWER PROJECT APPLICATION
     DEDICATION PROCEDURES
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE
     COLLECTION SYSTEM
     PRETREATMENT
     WASTEWATER TREATMENT
     LABORATORY
     SAFETY
ACCOUNTING
    
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
     MEETINGS
    
DOCUMENT INDEX
 
LINKS
 
H 10701 N. College Ave Suite A
Indianapolis, IN 46280
½  Mon- Fri  8:00am to 4:30pm
 
' Telephone 317-844-9200
7  Fax 317-844-9203
' Emergency 317-870-9136
   
   

                                                                                 

ODOR CONTROL
 
The District has for many years maintained an ongoing odor control program in order to minimize the effect of wastewater odors on the community. Customer feedback on wastewater odors is an important part of this program as odors are effected by weather, temperature, strength of flow, time of day and many other biological, chemical and environmental factors. Anytime a customer detects a wastewater odor, they should call the District and register a complaint so staff can investigate the situation. Customers should also check their homes for dry traps in their internal plumbing and check roof vent stacks for obstructions as these can contribute to odors entering homes directly.
 
The District first began its odor control program in 1990, just four years after serving its first customers. The most common source of odor complaints historically has been the District's Meridian Corridor Lift Station (#2) at the southeast corner of 106th & Springmill Road. The District has taken the challenge of controlling wastewater odors seriously and has evaluated a number of different mechanisms to control odors and be a good neighbor and community citizen.
 
There are numerous products marketed for odor control and many of these can become quite expensive, either through high up front equipment costs or through recurring operating costs for chemical additives. As such, in order to be good financial stewards, the District must balance costs with benefits continuously. For instance, as part of the District's plans to upgrade Lift Station #2, solutions are presently being weighed by the District with its consulting engineers. Among the options being considered is to enclose the entire lift station site within an attractive, residential-appearing structure. This concept was first broached in July 2003 so initial evaluations of the concept are currently underway.
 
Beginning in 1990, deodorizers and masking agents were used to clean the lift station wet well walls and a steam cleaning company was utilized to wash them down. The chemicals were expensive, required large and frequent applications and was not cost effective for the results generated. The steam cleaning was not capable of reaching the majority of the wet well. Today, District staff use owned equipment to periodically wash down the lift stations.
 
In 1992, the District conducted an analysis using ozone generating equipment from a local manufacturer (Tri Med Environmental Research Co.) at Lift Station #2. A box fan was used to blow ozone into the station's wet well but the results were insignificant and the project was abandoned as ineffective and potentially damaging to concrete and metal surfaces within the wet well.
 
By 1994, the District had progressed to working with a major wastewater industry supplier to formally analyze potential odor contributors in the wastewater stream, the most common of which is Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) which is a chemical byproduct of decomposing organics in wastewater. "Grab" samples were taken from targeted areas and it was determined that H2S was the primary odor agent and the force main from the Laurelwood Lift Station (District Station #8 located south of 106th Street off of Ditch Road) was identified as the largest contributor.
 
Once this determination was made, District staff began to research chemical additives and processes which could prevent or reduce the generation of H2S as an odor causing agent. In 1996, the District purchased a Bioxide chemical feed system from US Filter which treats the Station 8 force main by dosing the wet well with nitrate salts which are supposed to prevent the formation of H2S. This equipment (see photos below)  is still in place and has been proven to prevent H2S formation from this source. The one time unit cost and installation was $8500.00 and requires an annual cost of $4000.00 worth of chemicals.
 
In 1997, the District purchased a Flygt Mixer primarily to address the excessive amount of grease collected at Station 8. District staff believed this also contributed to the reduction of odor by introducing air back into the sewage preventing it from going septic while also suspending solids long enough to be pumped through the system. The District currently has two of these units, both are at stations the directly contribute to Lift Station 2.
 
Again in 1997, the District evaluated another ozone unit for Lift Station 2, this time in a different configuration where air is drawn from the wet well and passing it by ozone in the onsite unit to neutralize it before releasing it into the atmosphere.  The District currently has three such units in service. The following photo depicts the unit at Lift Station 2.
 
During an upgrade in 1998 at Lift Station 1 (behind the Brooks Bend subdivision near 99th & Keystone), the District added a Purifil air scrubber unit which draws air through a combination of charcoal and other medias. In addition, District staff worked with the Brooks Bend homeowners association to install a row of evergreen trees around the lift station and along the lake berm in order to provide a visual screen for the station as well. While complaints about the station's odor have been eliminated, staff remains unsatisfied with the unique odor omitted from the unit's media. Annual cost of replacing the media is $3600.00. The District currently has 2 of these units (see following photos).
 
In continuing its efforts to evaluate a variety of types of equipment under different lift station conditions, the District purchased a SulfaTreat Drum System for $2500.00 for Lift Station 10 in the Ashbrook Subdivision in 1998. This unit also draws air through a charcoal media (see following photo) and is smaller than the Purifil units. While complaints about the station's odor have been eliminated, staff remains unsatisfied with the unique odor omitted from the unit's media.
 
By 2001, District staff had also evaluated extending the wet well vents above ground to incorporate a chamber of chemical deodorizer so that exhausted air comes into contact with the chemical right before it's released into the atmosphere. This was marginally effective and abandoned for more effective means. In 2002, the District added signage at all lift stations with a phone number and our website address to encourage feedback from customers and other stakeholders. In addition, during a 2002 upgrade to Lift Station 2, the District added a third pump with a mix-flush valve attachment which aids in odor reduction by keeping the solids suspended so they will not collect in the wet well and become septic and can be more easily pumped through the system vs. During that same upgrade, an attempt was made to further reduce odors by venting the manhole at the head of the lift station but this arrangement was unsatisfactory and the unit was re-piped to its original configuration.